: When substantial justice and technical considerations (like a minor delay) are pitted against each other, the cause of substantial justice must prevail. Pragmatic Approach
When indexed within Southeast Asian legal frameworks, references to "Sek 1987" connect directly to (APJ 1987), which commenced operations on September 24, 1987 .
: Any other person who was using the vehicle, or who has custody over it, must also provide any information they have that could identify the driver if requested by a police officer or traffic warden. What Happens if You Fail to Comply? (Subsection 2)
: Riding on a single wheel on public highways. 1 sek 1142 apj 1987
Instead, the JPJ exercises its power under Section 114 to trace the registered vehicle owner. The resulting legally compels the vehicle owner to report to a JPJ office to reveal who was driving the vehicle at the exact time of the alleged offense.
: Failing to provide this information when requested is itself an offense. Under the Act, if the requested information is not supplied, the person may be liable to a fine or imprisonment. Key Takeaways for Vehicle Owners
Riding exclusively on the rear wheel through traffic. What Happens if You Fail to Comply
Within this comprehensive legal architecture, focuses strictly on traffic regulations and criminal penalties. Sections 41 through 45 are the most widely cited by the Polis Diraja Malaysia (PDRM) and the Jabatan Pengangkutan Jalan (JPJ) because they govern major offenses like causing death by reckless driving (Section 41), driving under the influence, and reckless driving itself under Section 42. ⚖️ Breaking Down Seksyen 42(1) APJ 1987
Conviction also leads to disqualification from holding or obtaining a driving license for at least five years. Option 2: Public Safety Reminder (Educational) Know the Law: Reckless & Dangerous Driving Did you know? Under Sek. 42(1) APJ 1987
: In this context, "Sek" often refers to a specific section or secretariat directive within the Swedish parliamentary or government offices. The resulting legally compels the vehicle owner to
Imprisonment up to 15 years; fines up to RM100,000; 10-year license ban. Enforcement and the "1142" Context
: It held that whatever is fairly regarded as incidental to things authorized by the Legislature should not be held ultra vires (beyond power) unless expressly prohibited. Significance This case is frequently cited in Indian administrative law
Section 114 functions as an information-gathering tool. When an offense is caught via an automated enforcement system camera (such as AES/AWAS) or recorded during a hit-and-run incident, authorities frequently cannot immediately identify the individual behind the wheel. They only have access to the vehicle's registration number plate.
